Telemedicina como ferramenta para o manejo do AVC: up to date 2024
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Introdução: A teleneurologia, que envolve o uso de tecnologias de telecomunicação para fornecer assistência médica remota em neurologia, está se tornando cada vez mais relevante no tratamento do AVC devido à sua capacidade de conectar pacientes em áreas remotas a especialistas em AVC em tempo real.
Objetivo: Investigar se a teleneurologia oferece benefícios suficientes para justificar sua regulamentação e implementação nos serviços de tratamento de AVC.
Método: A revisão sistemática foi conduzida seguindo uma série de etapas metodológicas. Primeiro, foi estabelecido o tema “Teleneurologia e seu papel na terapia de AVCs” e formulada a questão norteadora “A teleneurologia tem benefício suficiente para ser regulamentada e utilizada em serviços de tratamento de AVCs?”. Em seguida, foram definidos os critérios de inclusão e exclusão dos artigos, bem como as informações a serem extraídas dos estudos selecionados. Ampla pesquisa foi realizada em bases de dados acadêmicas usando combinação de descritores relacionados à telemedicina e ao AVC.
Resultado: A revisão identificou 782 artigos relevantes, dos quais 35 foram selecionados para análise. Os resultados destacam a importância da telemedicina no tratamento do AVC, especialmente na trombólise precoce e na monitorização pós-tratamento. Além disso, foram discutidas as implicações éticas da telemedicina, os avanços tecnológicos, incluindo o uso de inteligência artificial e telemetria, e os modelos de cuidados baseados em telemedicina, como unidades móveis de AVC e redes de telestroke.
Conclusão: Resultados sugerem que a teleneurologia oferece benefícios significativos no tratamento do AVC, incluindo a redução do tempo até o início do tratamento e a melhoria dos resultados clínicos.
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Referências
Aquino ER da S, Suffert SCI. Telemedicine in neurology: advances and possibilities. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022;80(5 Suppl 1):336–41. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x-anp-2022-s127
Domingues RB, Mantese CE, Aquino E da S, Fantini FGMM, do Prado GF, Nitrini R. Telemedicine in neurology: current evidence. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2020;78(12):818–26. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20200131
Chirra M, Marsili L, Wattley L, Sokol LL, Keeling E, Maule S, et al. Telemedicine in neurological disorders: opportunities and challenges. Telemed e-Health. 2019;25(7):541–50. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0101
Larner AJ. Teleneurology: an overview of current status. Pract Neurol. 2011;11(5):283–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/practneurol-2011-000090
Hatcher-Martin JM, Adams JL, Anderson ER, Bove R, Burrurs TM, Chehrenama M, et al. Telemedicine in neurology. Neurology. 2019;93(10):e1–e8. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000008708
Lin CH, Lee KW, Chen TC, Lin JH, Liaw KR, Hsiao PJ, et al. Quality and safety of telemedicine in acute ischemic stroke: early experience in Taiwan. J Formos Med Assoc. 2022;121(1 Pt 2):314–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2021.04.024
Heemskerk JL, Domingo RA, Tawk RG, Vivas-Buitrago TG, Huang JF, Rogers A, et al. Time is brain: prehospital emergency medical services response times for suspected stroke and effects of prehospital interventions. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(6):1446-1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.08.050
Mosconi MG, Paciaroni M. Treatments in ischemic stroke: current and future. Eur Neurol. 2022;85(5):349-66. https://doi.org/10.1159/000525822
Sarfo FS, Ulasavets U, Opare-Sem OK, Ovbiagele B. Tele-rehabilitation after stroke: an updated systematic review of the literature. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(9):2306–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2018.05.013
Weber J, Ebinger M, Audebert HJ. Prehospital stroke care: telemedicine, thrombolysis and neuroprotection. Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(7):753–61. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.2015.1051967
Evans NR, Sibson L, Day DJ, Agarwal S, Shekhar R, Warburton EA. Hyperacute stroke thrombolysis via telemedicine: a multicentre study of performance, safety and clinical efficacy. BMJ Open. 2022;12(1):e057372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057372
Rubin MN, Demaerschalk BM. The use of telemedicine in the management of acute stroke. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;36(1):E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.11.focus13428
Cramer SC, Dodakian L, Le V, See J, Augsburger R, McKenzie A, et al. Efficacy of home-based telerehabilitation vs in-clinic therapy for adults after stroke. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(9):1079–87. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.1604
Itrat A, Taqui A, Cerejo R, Briggs F, Cho SM, Organek N, et al. Telemedicine in prehospital stroke evaluation and thrombolysis. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(2):162–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.3849
Fassbender K, Grotta JC, Walter S, Grunwald IQ, Ragoschke-Schumm A, Saver JL. Mobile stroke units for prehospital thrombolysis, triage, and beyond: benefits and challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(3):227–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30008-x
Mathur S, Walter S, Grunwald IQ, Helwig SA, Lesmeister M, Fassbender K. Improving prehospital stroke services in rural and underserved settings with mobile stroke units. Front Neurol. 2019;10:159. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00159
Geisler F, Kunz A, Winter B, Rozanski M, Waldschmidt C, Weber JE, et al. Telemedicine in prehospital acute stroke care. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8(6):e010343. https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.118.011729
Puetz V, Bodechtel U, Gerber JC, Dzialowski I, Kunz A, Wolz M, et al. Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine. Neurology. 2013;80(4):332–8. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0b013e31827f07d0
Solenski NJ. Telestroke. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2018;28(4):551–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nic.2018.06.012
Kircher C, Kreitzer N, Adeoye O. Pre and intrahospital workflow for acute stroke treatment. Curr Opin Neurol. 2016;29(1):14–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/wco.0000000000000281
Zhai Y, Zhu WJ, Hou HL, Sun DX, Zhao J. Efficacy of telemedicine for thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2015;21(3):123–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x15571357
Legris N, Hervieu-Bègue M, Daubail B, Daumas A, Delpont B, Osseby GV, et al. Telemedicine for the acute management of stroke in Burgundy, France: an evaluation of effectiveness and safety. Eur J Neurol. 2016;23(9):1433-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13054
Alberts MJ, Wechsler LR, Jensen MEL, Latchaw RE, Crocco TJ, George MG, et al. Formation and function of acute stroke–ready hospitals within a stroke system of care: recommendations from the Brain Attack Coalition. Stroke. 2013;44(12):3382–93. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.113.002285
Bladin CF, Cadilhac DA. Effect of telestroke on emergent stroke care and stroke outcomes. Stroke. 2014;45(6):1876-80. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.114.003825
Belt GH, Felberg RA, Rubin J, Halperin JJ. In-transit telemedicine speeds ischemic stroke treatment. Stroke. 2016;47(9):2413–5. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.116.014270
Burgos PI, Lara O, Lavado A, Rojas-Sepúlveda I, Delgado C, Bravo E, et al. Exergames and telerehabilitation on smartphones to improve balance in stroke patients. Brain Sci. 2020;10(11):773. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10110773
Subbarao BS, Stokke J, Martin SJ. Telerehabilitation in acquired brain injury. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2021;32(2):223–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmr.2021.01.001
Witrick B, Zhang D, Switzer JA, Hess DC, Shi L. The association between stroke mortality and time of admission and participation in a telestroke network. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(2):104480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104480
Lopez-Pedrera C, Oteros R, Ibáñez-Costa A, Luque-Tévar M, Muñoz-Barrera L, Barbarroja N, et al. The thrombus proteome in stroke reveals a key role of the innate immune system and new insights associated with its etiology, severity, and prognosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;21(10):2894-907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtha.2023.04.015
Aramini R, Brignone M, Mestriner D, Pastorino M, Procopio R, Rachidi F, et al. Computation of the attenuation function of the lightning return-stroke current from electromagnetic fields measured in a short-duration time-window, Part I: theoretical investigation. Electr Power Syst Res. 2023;221:109392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2023.109392
Schumm L, Lamale CL, Major S, Hecht N, Nieminen-Kelhä M, Zdunczyk A, et al. Physiological variables in association with spreading depolarizations in the late phase of ischemic stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2021;42(1):121–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678x211039628
Dromerick AW, Geed S, Barth J, Brady K, Giannetti ML, Mitchell A, et al. Critical Period After Stroke Study (CPASS): a phase II clinical trial testing an optimal time for motor recovery after stroke in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(39):e2026676118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026676118
Bernstein RA, Kamel H, Granger CB, Piccini JP, Sethi PP, Katz JM, et al. Effect of long-term continuous cardiac monitoring vs usual care on detection of atrial fibrillation in patients with stroke attributed to large- or small-vessel disease: the STROKE-AF randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;325(21):2169–77. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6470
Stevens ER, Roberts E, Kuczynski HC, Boden-Albala B. Stroke warning information and faster treatment (SWIFT): cost-effectiveness of a stroke preparedness intervention. Value Health. 2019;22(11):1240–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.003
Chae SH, Kim Y, Lee KS, Park HS. Development and clinical evaluation of a web-based upper limb home rehabilitation system using a smartwatch and machine learning model for chronic stroke survivors: prospective comparative study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020;8(7):e17216. https://doi.org/10.2196/17216